{
  "anchors": [
    "Yes, citywide and continuous: public spaces carry no expectation of anonymity.",
    "Yes, for serious-crime watchlists only, with judicial oversight and published error rates.",
    "Only time-boxed deployments for specific events or threats, publicly disclosed afterwards.",
    "Only retrospective use in investigations under warrant: never live scanning.",
    "Ban it: chilling effects on assembly and protest outweigh policing gains."
  ],
  "code": "A2",
  "consensus": false,
  "division": null,
  "domain": "surveillance-privacy",
  "domain_name": "Surveillance & Privacy",
  "hi": null,
  "is_calibration": false,
  "lo": null,
  "polarity": "restrictive_high",
  "question_line": "Should police use live facial recognition in public spaces?",
  "scenario": "A city police department is considering live facial-recognition scanning of people in public spaces.",
  "seats": [],
  "spread": null,
  "tension": "safety vs. being watched"
}