{
  "anchors": [
    "Yes, broadly: protecting public funds justifies algorithmic screening.",
    "Yes, as a flagging tool with published error rates; humans make every decision.",
    "Only with strong due-process rights: explanation, appeal, compensation for wrongful flags.",
    "Only for post-payment audit patterns: never pre-payment denial.",
    "No: automated suspicion aimed at the poorest citizens repeats proven catastrophes."
  ],
  "code": "A7",
  "consensus": false,
  "division": null,
  "domain": "automated-judgment",
  "domain_name": "Automated Judgment",
  "hi": null,
  "is_calibration": false,
  "lo": null,
  "polarity": "restrictive_high",
  "question_line": "Should governments use AI to detect fraud in welfare and benefits systems?",
  "scenario": "A government agency is considering AI systems to detect fraud in welfare and benefits programs.",
  "seats": [],
  "spread": null,
  "tension": "when a machine may decide about a human"
}