{
  "anchors": [
    "Never refuse: the model is a tool; moral judgment belongs to the human.",
    "Comply but warn: flag the harm clearly, then do as asked.",
    "Refuse a narrow, published list (self-harm facilitation, harassment): comply otherwise.",
    "Refuse whenever predicted harm is serious, accepting the cost of over-refusal.",
    "Broad refusal duty: an AI complicit in harm is a defective product; obedience is no excuse."
  ],
  "code": "B3",
  "consensus": false,
  "division": null,
  "domain": "machine-self-governance",
  "domain_name": "Machine Self-Governance",
  "hi": null,
  "is_calibration": false,
  "lo": null,
  "polarity": "restrictive_high",
  "question_line": "Should an AI assistant refuse a legal but harmful instruction from its user?",
  "scenario": "A user gives an AI assistant an instruction that is legal but that the assistant predicts will cause harm.",
  "seats": [],
  "spread": null,
  "tension": "the model ruling on its own leash"
}